A typical case, not a client
This study does not describe any real clients and does not report any results obtained from a client: our confidentiality commitments prohibit this. It sets out explicit working hypotheses and then deduces orders of magnitude through a calculation that you can replicate line by line. Change a hypothesis, and the result changes. During a diagnosis, these hypotheses are replaced by your actual figures.
The modelled situation
In a context where regulatory and societal pressure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions continues to increase, companies must adapt and take concrete measures. Constructing a carbon footprint across the three scopes allows for the identification of emission sources, whether direct or indirect, and prioritises actions to be taken. This footprint is essential not only to meet stakeholder expectations but also to anticipate regulatory developments. Companies must also consider the challenges of their value chain and the impacts of their strategic choices on the environment. Implementing such a footprint requires interdisciplinary collaboration and strong commitment from management.
| Initial hypothesis | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Sites to cover | 3 | sites |
| Emission sources to document | 22 | sources |
| Suppliers representing the majority of purchases | 40 | suppliers |
| Proportion of purchases covered by these suppliers | 80 | % |
Result, line by line
The calculation table presents the various identified emission sources as well as the results obtained for each scope. It is important to note that this table does not provide qualitative analyses but focuses on quantitative data. The above assumptions must be taken into account to correctly interpret the results. Each row of the table corresponds to an emission source, while the columns indicate the calculated values. A careful reading of the notes at the bottom of the table may also provide clarifications on the calculation methods used.
| Calculated magnitude | Formula | Result | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data collections to be organised | 3 sites × 22 positions | 66 | collections |
| Suppliers to be approached for scope 3 | 40 suppliers | 40 | suppliers |
| Proportion of purchases documented at the end of the campaign | 80 % of purchases | 80 | % of purchases |
| Sources remaining to be estimated using sector ratios | 100 % − 80 % | 20 | % of purchases |
What we measure first
Identification of emission sources
An initial diagnosis should map all sources of emissions for the company, taking into account the three defined scopes.
Analysis of existing data
It is essential to examine the available data to assess the reliability and relevance of information on emissions.
Stakeholder involvement
The engagement of internal and external stakeholders is crucial to ensure the success of the initiative.
Evaluation of current practices
An analysis of the company's current practices regarding emissions management will identify areas for improvement.
How the mission unfolds
Establishment of a methodological framework
Define a clear framework for the collection and analysis of emission-related data.
Data collection
Establish a systematic process for collecting the data necessary for the report.
Calculation of emissions
Use appropriate tools and methods to quantify greenhouse gas emissions.
Development of an action plan
Develop a concrete action plan to reduce identified emissions, setting clear objectives.
Monitoring and communication
Implement a system to track progress made and communicate results to stakeholders.
The indicators we implement
These indicators are recorded from the diagnosis and then monitored throughout the mission: they are what make the result demonstrable, rather than declarative.
- Proportion of emissions calculated from actual data rather than ratios
- Response rate of solicited suppliers
- Difference between two successive campaigns, at constant scope
- Number of reduction actions undertaken and their progress
- Deadline for producing the report after the end of the financial year
What causes this type of project to fail
Lack of reliable data+
Non-involvement of stakeholders+
Lack of monitoring+
Poorly defined objectives+
What is being asked of us
Why is it important to consider the three scopes?+
How to ensure the reliability of the collected data?+
What actions can be implemented to reduce emissions?+
How to communicate on the emissions report?+
Let's redo this calculation with your figures
The diagnosis replaces each hypothesis on this page with data collected from you. It lasts half a day and does not commit you to anything.
Request a diagnosisPoursuivre la lecture
Combien de travail représente une certification ISO 22000
Lire →Se préparer à l'évaluation du Label RSE de la CGEM
Lire →Ce que représente le déploiement d'un ERP en distribution
Lire →Pour le détail technique du référentiel concerné, consultez les dossiers d'expertise.
